The statement is trying to say that laws and regulations cannot coexist with a person’ freedom. If there are laws, then a person’s freedom cannot be complete and their life would be restricted in some way, shape or form.
There are numerous ways in which laws can limit a person’s freedom.
Some examples may include: laws for women and men are mostly equal in some countries whilst other countries have put certain restrictions based on a person’s gender.
Abortion laws vary in different countries. In UK, most abortion cases occur before 24 weeks. They can be carried out after but only if there are some complications e.g. if the mother’s life or health is at risk. In Sweden, however, the abortion law restricts this time period to 18 weeks.
Other than that, over-the-counter drugs vary between different countries.
However, other may argue that laws are made in order to allow everyone to live in harmony. They are created in a way so that everyone is given ample and equal opportunity to do what they want as long as it is reasonable and does not affect anyone else in a bad way.
The statement exaggerates that fact that individual freedom and rule of law are mutually incompatible. There have been many instances where freedom was gained without crossing the boundary of the rule of law e.g. Martin Luther King against racism.
The main reason for laws and regulations to be present is that it allows everyone to be equal. Laws prevent people from committing crimes and offences and if they do occur laws provide justice for those who were affected. Laws are also created with caution in order to minimise their interference with a person’s freedom.